<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>archiving on James Alvarez</title><link>https://jamesalvarez.co.uk/tags/archiving/</link><description>Recent content in archiving on James Alvarez</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jamesalvarez.co.uk/tags/archiving/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why you do not need blockchain for archiving historical data</title><link>https://jamesalvarez.co.uk/blog/blockchain-historical-data/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jamesalvarez.co.uk/blog/blockchain-historical-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TLDR: You can take the useful part of blockchains - hash chains - and reject the resource wasting over complexity.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I learnt recently that a prominent historical archive was an early adopter of blockchain technology to ongoingly verify the historical accuracy of their records, including written testimonies, photographs and historical accounts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think this is &lt;em&gt;almost&lt;/em&gt; a good use for the technology - but there are simpler alternatives - including one which has proven it's strength in the wild... of digital piracy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>